UKCAT Results

The information below relates to the 2016 UKCAT and the 2017 UKCAT (Humanitas University).


When candidates leave the test centre they are given a copy of their UKCAT Score Report.

Results are valid for the 2016 UCAS Admissions cycle (for entry into medical or dental school in 2017 or deferred entry to 2018).

 

Marking

There is no negative marking for incorrect answers.  Performance on one item does not influence which other items are presented.

Cognitive Subtests

Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Abstract Reasoning are marked on the number of correct answers a candidate gives.

As the number of items varies between Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Abstract Reasoning it is not possible to make a direct comparison of the raw scores between the cognitive subtests. Raw scores are therefore converted to scale scores that share a common range from 300 to 900.

A total scale score is generated by summing the individual scale scores of Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Abstract Reasoning.  In 2016 a total scale score ranges from 900 to 2700.

Candidates should note that prior to 2016 scale scores ranged from 1200 to 3600 because four cognitive subtests contributed to the overall score.  They need to be aware of this when comparing their scores to those used by Universities in previous years.  Further details can be found here.

Decision Making

In 2016 UKCAT is piloting a new Decision Making subtest.  Candidates will not receive a score for this subtest and their results for this section will not be communicated to their chosen medical and dental schools and will not be taken into consideration by universities during their admission processes.

 

Situational Judgement

Within the Situational Judgement test, full marks are awarded for an item if the response matches the correct answer and partial marks awarded if the response is close to the correct answer.

Raw scores for the Situational Judgement subtest are expressed in one of four bands, with band 1 being the highest.  Alongside their band, candidates will be given an interpretation of this performance:


Band 1

Those in Band 1 demonstrated an excellent level of performance, showing similar judgement in most cases to the panel of experts.

Band 2

Those in Band 2 demonstrated a good, solid level of performance, showing appropriate judgement frequently, with many responses matching model answers.

Band 3

Those in Band 3 demonstrated a modest level of performance, with appropriate judgement shown for some questions and substantial differences from ideal responses for others.

Band 4

The performance of those in Band 4 was low, with judgement tending to differ substantially from ideal responses in many cases.

As the Situational Judgement test is a measure of non-cognitive attributes, it will be considered by universities in a different manner to the cognitive subtests. Please refer to their websites for more details.